Cooperation in 2011 and 2012. However, it did not believe U.S. authorities needed to review the other six governments, including Britain and Australia, she said, citing various reasons.” [Reuters, 3/19/15] Reuters: The Clinton Foundation’s Online Donor List “Has Not Included Those Who Donated Just To CHAI Since The Initiative Was Spun Off In 2010.” “Since it was published in 2008, the foundation's online donor list has been updated annually, naming everyone from individuals giving a few dollars to governments awarding eight-figure grants, the foundation said. It has been pored over by interest groups, the Clintons' political opponents, and the media. The foundation list has not included those who donated just to CHAI since the initiative was spun off in 2010, foundation spokesman Craig Minassian said. Minassian said the foundation believed CHAI continued to be bound by the agreement with the Obama administration.” [Reuters, 3/19/15] Reuters: The Clinton Foundation “Believed CHAI Continued To Be Bound By The Agreement With The Obama Administration” Made In 2009 To Disclose Donors. [Reuters, 3/19/15] A CHAI Spokeswoman Explained That Millions In Donations To CHAI From Australia And The U.K. Were Not Reviewed By The State Department Because The Money Was Considered Part Of “Expansions Of Existing Programs.” “In 2008, the Clintons agreed that existing government contributors that wanted to ‘materially increase’ their commitments during Hillary Clinton's tenure would be reviewed by State. Australia almost doubled its support between 2009-2012, to $12.2 million, while the United Kingdom nearly tripled its support, to $11.2 million. CHAI did not report these increases to the State Department because the new money was for ‘expansions of existing programs,’ [CHAI spokeswoman] Daley said.” [Reuters, 3/19/15] A CHAI Spokeswoman Explained That CHAI Donations From Swaziland And Papua New Guinea Were Not Reviewed By The State Department Because They “Originated From Other Sources.” “[CHAI spokeswoman] Daley also provided a number of explanations for why other governments that appeared on a donor list provided to Reuters did not need to be reviewed by the State Department. Swaziland and Papua New Guinea, which gave small grants for AIDS programs, were not submitted for review because the money they gave originated from other sources, including existing donor Australia and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, she said.” [Reuters, 3/19/15] CHAI Donations From Sweden Were Not Reviewed By The State Department Because Sweden Had First Donated To CHAI Before 2009. “In the case of Sweden, its International Development Cooperation Agency has given CHAI $7.2 million since 2012 to train health workers in Zambia, but nothing in at least the previous three years. This did not need State review because Sweden had given to the foundation prior to 2009, Daley said.” [Reuters, 3/19/15] Reuters: CHAI Donations From Rwanda Were Not Reviewed By The State Department Because “CHAI Considered This A Fee For Medical Work It Did In The Country, Not A Grant Or Donation.” “Rwanda, which CHAI listed as a donor, gave the charity $200,000 in 2012. CHAI considered this a fee for medical work it did in the country, not a grant or donation, and so did not tell the State Department about it, Daley said.” [Reuters, 3/19/15] Reuters: The Clinton Health Access Initiative Also Received Donations From The Governments Of Ireland, Norway, Cameroon, Canada, Flanders, And Lesotho Between 2009 And 2014. [Reuters, 3/19/15] Reuters: Donated Money From Foreign Governments “Amounted To About 1 Percent Of CHAI's Total Budget.” “Money from all of these governments amounted to about 1 percent of CHAI's total budget, she said.” [Reuters, 3/19/15] THE CLINTON HEALTH ACCESS INITIATIVE PUBLISHED A DONOR LIST IN FEBRUARY 2015 The Clinton Health Access Initiative Published A 2010-2014 Donor List On February 6, 2015. [Clinton Health Access Initiative, 2/6/15] Commented [SL1]: Having a hard time figuring out why you just listed these countries? There were more on the chart